Pre Election polls put Obama ahead by 8.3%

USA Today Exit Polls predict Obama win

Guardian Exit Polls predict Obama win

By Machine
Clinton: 39.595%
Obama: 36.386%

By Hand
Obama: 38.785%
Clinton: 34.703%

Vote Fraud Confirmed in Sutton, New Hampshire

One man programs 81% of New Hampshire voting machines

Major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire are circulating after
Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit
to defeat Barack Obama with the aid of Diebold electronic
voting machines, while confirmed votes for Ron Paul
in the Sutton district were not even counted.
According
to a voter in Sutton, New Hampshire, three of
her family members voted for Ron Paul, yet when she
checked the voting map on the Politico website, the
total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map still says zero votes for Ron
Paul as you can see below.

CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT

It’s not as if Sutton had had a handful of voters like some other districts
- a total of 386 people voted yet we are led to believe
that not one voted for Ron Paul? Judging by the Iowa results, around 10% of residents would be expected
to vote for the Congressman, returning a total of around 38 votes in this district.
Let’s be ultra-conservative and say just 5% support Paul - he’d still get 19 votes
- but he got absolutely none whatsoever.
Is there something wrong with this picture?
Greenville also tallied 144 votes yet not one for Congressman Paul.
Anyone else in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul needs to go public immediately
with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Diebold voting machines also did Congressman Paul no favors last night
- compared to hand counted ballots Giuliani gained just short of 0.5% from electronic voting
whereas Paul lost over 2%, which was the difference between finishing 4th and 5th,
as this graph documents.
Mitt Romney profited the most from the Diebold swing, he received 7% more votes compared to hand counted ballots.

In the Democratic race the Diebold voting machines clearly swung the primary in Hillary Clinton’s favor
at the expense of Barack Obama, who had a commanding lead over the New York Senator going into the contest.
Zogby polling numbers
had Obama leading Clinton by a whopping 42/29 per cent,
yet Clinton eventually took the primary by three per cent.
“If I was Barack Obama, I’d certainly not have conceded this election this quickly,”; writes
The Brad Blog. “I’m not quite sure what he was thinking.
And as far as offering an indication of whether he understands how these systems work,
and the necessity of making sure that votes are counted, and counted accurately,
it does not offer a great deal of confidence at this hour.”

the Democratic Party leadership (read major financial backers) want a Clinton victory
and are clearly willing to overlook NOT ONLY the most egregious violations of electoral protocols
in modern history (the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections..for those that are STILL confused)
but are willing to THEMSELVES exploit the ridiculous and blatant deficiencies in the Diebold Voting machines
to serve “their own” ends.

THE ENTIRE ELECTORAL PROCESS IN AMERICA IS AN INSULT TO ANY THINKING PERSON
WITH AN INTEREST IN DEMOCRACY AND ITS PROCESSES.

now go back to your TV game show reality..